Meanwhile, a spokesman for the university said: 'The University of Glasgow condemns discrimination of any kind and is committed to promoting equality and diversity across its community and campus. Interviews have been carried out with staff and students and the report is due to be published within weeks. In January Morag Ross, QC, was appointed by the university to carry out a review of the institutions's approach to addressing gender-based violence, including harassment and harmful practices that are 'committed disproportionately by men against women'.
'This is insidious and can cause serious long term consequences.' 'This goes way past 'banter' and could seriously undermine the confidence of the female students. The professor used a cartoon of Homer Simpson to illustrate the 'male brain' with elements such as 'sleep', 'donuts' and 'sex'įeminists were furious with the professor showing the diagrams, with a spokeswoman for the Scottish Feminism Network saying: ' How can female students expect to be treated with respect by peers or by lecturers if that is considered acceptable? The main section of the 'female brain' was also depicted as the 'headache generator', slotted next to a large shape which read 'talk, talk and more talk'. Meanwhile, larger sections of the brain were labelled as the 'gossip control centre', 'shoes', 'shiny things and diamonds olfactory'. Olfactory is a term for the nerve which enables sense of smell. The professor, who is also a neurologist at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow, used a cartoon of Homer Simpson to depict the 'male brain', which included elements such as 'sleep', 'donuts' and 'sex'.īut the 'female brain' cartoon received widespread backlash after it included smaller labels such as 'driving skills' and 'sex-initiation gland' as well as 'realization of wants vs.
Leech brains series#
He also confirmed that before the cartoons were showed, he did in fact show actual diagrams of both the male and female brains.īut Mr Leach, head of undergraduate medicine at the University of Glasgow, sparked a series of complaints from students as well as Scottish feminists who said it went 'way past banter'. He now faces an investigation over the 2017 cartoons. Professor John Paul Leach, a former stand-up comedian who has performed at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, insisted that the point of showing the controversial diagram was to illustrate there is 'no difference in real life' between sexes. For actions in tort, you take a plaintiff as he or she comes - the fact that they have a condition that led to more damages than normal is not a factor in determining damages (the "thin skull" rule).A top neuroscientist and professor has apologised after coming under fire for showing students a cartoon of the 'female brain' which included an 'I told you so gland' and an 'impulse shopping' section.The ruling in Wagon Mound does not apply to cases where the outcome was unforeseeable to a particular plaintiff because of a condition that he or she had rather it is used in situations when the foreseeable connection between the action and the outcome is unreasonable.Therefore, as it is found that the burn was a negligent action on the part of Leech Brain as they did not provide ample safety, and it at least partially led to the development of the cancer, the defendants are liable. He states that the "thin skull" rule differentiates the two cases, and that this is a case of "taking your plaintiffs as they come" rather than insufficient proximity.
Parker does not think that the decision in Wagon Mound is relevant to this case.
The protection provided to employees during their work was very shoddy. The burn was treated, but he eventually developed cancer and died three years later. One day at work he came out from behind his protective shield when working and was struck in the lip by molten metal. He had previously worked in the gas industry, making him prone to cancer. Smith's husband worked in a factory owned by Leech Brain galvanizing steel.
0 kommentar(er)
